Does the ECJ pay enough attention to international law? This question has been the subject of much debate. By contrast, the question under which circumstances references to international law and international courts are actually reasonable has thus far received little attention.
This article examines the legal and cultural conflict between France and Italy over meat substitutes and lab-grown meat. It explores EU harmonization issues, Member States' opposition, and the broader ethical and economic implications for the future of food regulation in Europe.
This post examines the TAP Portugal judgment within the broader framework of consumer protection, arguing for the necessity of EU courts and regulators to reassess these standards and offer clearer guidance to ensure a fair balance of rights and interests.
This post argues that a ban on fossil advertising is a necessary, albeit insufficient, measure in the urgent quest to curb climate change—and importantly, it is perfectly legal.
This post discusses the French and Italian provisions banning names of meat-based products from their plant-based countrparts, and their compatibility with EU law.
The aim of this contribution is to discuss the interpretation of 'extraordinary circumstances' found in current case-law and what the recently decided case adds to it.
This post discusses the fact that the proposed EU Platform Regulation apparently – seemingly unintentionally – would not apply to ‘underlying service-attached intermediation activities’ offered by platforms such as Uber and Deliveroo. and proposes a way to fix it.